Ever watched an episode of Cops? Ever notice how officers will post up outside a house known for drug sales, wait for a customer to drive away then pull them over for a seemingly miniscule Vehicle Code violation? What's the first question the cop ALWAYS asks? "Got any drugs in the car?"
This is what is known as a "pretext stop," and according to the U.S. Supreme Court in Whren v. United States and Arkansas v. Sullivan, an officer's subjective intentions are irrelevant so long as there is probable cause, independent of those suspicions, to believe a crime, no matter how minute, has been committed. Put another way, once lawfully pulled over, officers are free to investigate any potential unrelated criminal activity. This was not always the case. Until these relatively recent decisions came down, these types of tactics were deemed unconstitutional and viewed as a way for officers to circumvent the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment.
What is even more unsettling, even if an officer pulls you over for violating the "wrong" statute, the stop does not violate the Fourth Amendment, so long as there is a "right" statute that applies to your conduct. That is to say, if an officer pulls you over for speeding, but it turns out that you were not in fact speeding, the stop is still legal so long as there is another basis for the stop, such as having a broken tail lamp.
Pretext stops also go hand in hand with racial profiling. If an officer has a hunch someone is up to no good, even if it is because of the color of his or her skin, the officer is free to stop the person and question them about any and all criminal conduct, so long as there is a basis for the vehicle stop.
The lesson to take away from this is that you can be pulled over for the smallest of infractions as pretext for a collateral criminal investigation and that officers have a great deal of leeway in justifying such stops. You've been warned!
“I can not recommend Scott Thomas enough. Four months after my husband died a family member, who was very depressed and grieving, was in a single car accident and was arrested and charged. As we had never had any traffic violations, much less any arrests, we had no idea of how to proceed and we were overwhelmed. Scott was there for us every step of the way, his professionalism was outstanding, as was his expertise. He fought for us and got us the best possible outcome. He answered all our questions and gave us assistance when we it was needed. I would definitely work with him again, if ever needed, and strongly recommend him.”
“I was very satisfied with the result of my case. Scott Was able to answer any questions anytime a day before and after my case. I would not hesitate recommend Mr. Thomas To anyone who is uncertain of which Attourney to handle their legal problems .”
“Scott was awesome from day one. This was my first experience with having representation, and it was well worth it. He 100% has his clients best interest in mind. It didn't matter how long it took or whatever obstacles came alone, he made sure to do whatever was best for me happen. Even after everything is done and over with, he is willing to be there and help with anything else is needed. With whatever you need I would strongly recommend him.”